Indicator - FL Memo
Telephone: (01233) 653500. Fax: (01233) 647100 customer.services@indicator-flm.co.uk - www.indicator-flm.co.uk
Calgarth House, 39-41 Bank Street, Ashford, Kent TN23 1DQ VAT GB 726 598 394. Registered in England. Company Registration No. 3599719
[telephone_number] => (01233) 653500
[lastname_cp] =>
[city_county] => Kent TN23 1DQ
[country] => United Kingdom
[website1] => www.indicator-flm.co.uk
[loyalty_agent] => Gemma Rump
[loyalty_phone] => (01233) 438022
[city] => Ashford
[webshop] => http://www.indicator-flm.co.uk
[loyalty_time] => <strong>Contact online support for any issues relating to the use of this online solution</strong>, for example logging in, using the search facility, understanding how the resources differ, how to save content, etc. <br />
If you have a <strong>technical question</strong> about <strong>content</strong>, please contact our <strong>dedicated Helpline</strong>.<br />
Mariam, your online support, can be <strong>contacted during normal business hours</strong>:
[vat_name] => VAT
[vat_value] => GB 726 598 394
[website2] => www.flmemo.co.uk
[emailcs] => customer.services@indicator-flm.co.uk
[fax_number] => (01233) 647100
[street_number] => 39-41
[street_name] => Bank Street
[loyalty_mail_from] => Gemma Rump - Online support
[company_name] => Indicator - FL Memo Ltd
)
[_contribArray] => Array
(
)
[decodeAddresscharacters] => 1
[isDevSite] =>
)
Search - Tips & Advice Business Database
An employee who was sacked after he recommended another local supplier’s meat deal on his personal Facebook account has won his claim for unfair dismissal. Where did the employer go wrong?
An employee who was sacked after he fought with a customer over a pair of trainers has won his tribunal claims for unfair dismissal and discrimination. Where did the employer go wrong?
An employee who was dismissed after the police charged him with possessing indecent images has won his claim for unfair dismissal. What mustn’t you do when an employee is facing criminal charges?
An employee who was sacked after he “liked” a comment on Facebook about hitting a line manager has won his claim for unfair dismissal and been awarded over £32,000. Where did the employer go wrong?
Of course you know that if you unfairly dismiss an employee you’ll have to pay the price - compensation will be awarded against you. But is this all you’ll have to worry about? Are there any hidden
costs too?
When an employee was kicked unconscious at his desk his manager was sacked for “failing to adequately protect him from harassment”. Why did the tribunal rule that her dismissal was actually unfair?
The tribunal has ruled that a postman sacked by Royal Mail for urinating in a lay-by whilst on his round was unfairly dismissed and awarded him nearly £40,000 in compensation. Where did bosses at
Royal Mail go wrong?
The tribunal has ruled an employee who was sacked because his employer discovered that he had used cannabis in his private time was unfairly dismissed. Why did the tribunal reach this conclusion?
An employee who was sacked for sending a customer’s details to a colleague using his personal mobile phone has successfully claimed unfair dismissal, even though he admitted wrongdoing. Why did the
employer lose at the tribunal?
An employee who was dismissed following an argument over a tea break has successfully claimed unfair dismissal and been awarded over £20,000. Where did the employer go wrong?