Indicator - FL Memo
Telephone: (01233) 653500. Fax: (01233) 647100 customer.services@indicator-flm.co.uk - www.indicator-flm.co.uk
Calgarth House, 39-41 Bank Street, Ashford, Kent TN23 1DQ VAT GB 726 598 394. Registered in England. Company Registration No. 3599719
[telephone_number] => (01233) 653500
[lastname_cp] =>
[city_county] => Kent TN23 1DQ
[country] => United Kingdom
[website1] => www.indicator-flm.co.uk
[loyalty_agent] => Gemma Rump
[loyalty_phone] => (01233) 438022
[city] => Ashford
[webshop] => http://www.indicator-flm.co.uk
[loyalty_time] => <strong>Contact online support for any issues relating to the use of this online solution</strong>, for example logging in, using the search facility, understanding how the resources differ, how to save content, etc. <br />
If you have a <strong>technical question</strong> about <strong>content</strong>, please contact our <strong>dedicated Helpline</strong>.<br />
Mariam, your online support, can be <strong>contacted during normal business hours</strong>:
[vat_name] => VAT
[vat_value] => GB 726 598 394
[website2] => www.flmemo.co.uk
[emailcs] => customer.services@indicator-flm.co.uk
[fax_number] => (01233) 647100
[street_number] => 39-41
[street_name] => Bank Street
[loyalty_mail_from] => Gemma Rump - Online support
[company_name] => Indicator - FL Memo Ltd
)
[_contribArray] => Array
(
)
[decodeAddresscharacters] => 1
[isDevSite] =>
)
Search - Tips & Advice Business Database
An employee who was dismissed for gross misconduct after he told an abusive customer to “fuck off” has won his claim for unfair dismissal at the tribunal. Where did the employer go wrong?
British Airways (BA) has been ordered to pay a former employee over £19,000 in compensation after he succeeded in his claim for unfair dismissal. What was BA’s simple mistake?
A firefighter who was dismissed for gross misconduct because he called a gay colleague “Arthur” has won his tribunal claim and been awarded over £12,000. Where did the employer go wrong?
In a recent case, an employee was sacked for sleeping on the job in the employer’s first aid room. The tribunal concluded that his dismissal was both “fair and reasonable. Why did it reach this
decision?
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has agreed that a male employee who was sacked because he urinated in a loading yard was unfairly dismissed by his employer. Why did the employer lose this case?
In a 2021 case, the employer dismissed an employee after he was seen at a social club smoking during a period of sickness absence. The tribunal has now ruled that this was an unfair dismissal. Why?
An employee who was accused of stealing a soft drink and subsequently dismissed has been awarded over £20,000 by the tribunal. Where did the employer go wrong?
The tribunal has ruled an employee who was sacked because his employer discovered that he had used cannabis in his private time was unfairly dismissed. Why did the tribunal reach this conclusion?
We recently advised you that unfair dismissal claims must be brought within three months of the termination of employment. However, one employee has just been given a six-week extension. Has the rule
been changed?
Where the evidence at a disciplinary hearing reveals potential misconduct that wasn’t specified in your original notification of disciplinary hearing letter, are you required to adjourn proceedings
and send out a new letter?