Search results
You searched in
Business Advice Directory
all "Disciplinary issues and the new Code of Practice"
related advice.There are 10 results
You probably already know that the much-despised statutory disciplinary and grievance procedures will be abolished. But what will replace them?
Published 04.09.2008
To assist with the changeover between the statutory dispute resolution procedures and the new ACAS Code of Practice, there are some “transitional provisions”. What are they and when do they apply?
Published 02.04.2009
You know what when dismissing an employee you have to comply with the three-step statutory procedure. However, it seems that there are situations in which employers are omitting step 1. How can you
avoid the pitfalls?
Published 08.02.2007
You suspect that one of your employees has been stealing company equipment and need to carry out an investigation. In light of the new statutory disciplinary procedures, what changes do you need to
be aware of?
Published 18.01.2005
You need to discipline a younger member of staff and have notified them about the hearing. Trouble is, their mum also works for you and they’ve nominated her as their workplace representative! Can
you object to their choice?
Published 28.09.2009
On 11 March 2015 a revised Acas Code of Practice came into force; it now properly sets out the law relating to the right to be accompanied. Does this particular right apply to employees with less
than two years’ service?
Published 09.04.2015
Although the “new” disciplinary procedures have been with us for more than two years, it seems that many employers still haven’t got to grips with them. How can you avoid one of the most dangerous
traps?
Published 30.11.2006
You suspect that an employee has committed an act of misconduct and have appointed a manager to undertake a disciplinary investigation. Does the employee have any right to object to your choice of
investigator?
Published 09.09.2014
An employee committed an act of gross misconduct. You waited a day then summarily dismissed before following the modified disciplinary and dismissal procedure. They claim the delay made it an unfair
dismissal - correct?
Published 18.09.2008
Search all items in entire site