Indicator - FL Memo
Telephone: (01233) 653500. Fax: (01233) 647100 customer.services@indicator-flm.co.uk - www.indicator-flm.co.uk
Calgarth House, 39-41 Bank Street, Ashford, Kent TN23 1DQ VAT GB 726 598 394. Registered in England. Company Registration No. 3599719
[telephone_number] => (01233) 653500
[lastname_cp] =>
[city_county] => Kent TN23 1DQ
[country] => United Kingdom
[website1] => www.indicator-flm.co.uk
[loyalty_agent] => Gemma Rump
[loyalty_phone] => (01233) 438022
[city] => Ashford
[webshop] => http://www.indicator-flm.co.uk
[loyalty_time] => <strong>Contact online support for any issues relating to the use of this online solution</strong>, for example logging in, using the search facility, understanding how the resources differ, how to save content, etc. <br />
If you have a <strong>technical question</strong> about <strong>content</strong>, please contact our <strong>dedicated Helpline</strong>.<br />
Mariam, your online support, can be <strong>contacted during normal business hours</strong>:
[vat_name] => VAT
[vat_value] => GB 726 598 394
[website2] => www.flmemo.co.uk
[emailcs] => customer.services@indicator-flm.co.uk
[fax_number] => (01233) 647100
[street_number] => 39-41
[street_name] => Bank Street
[loyalty_mail_from] => Gemma Rump - Online support
[company_name] => Indicator - FL Memo Ltd
)
[_contribArray] => Array
(
)
[decodeAddresscharacters] => 1
[isDevSite] =>
)
Search - Tips & Advice Business Database
A firefighter who was dismissed for gross misconduct because he called a gay colleague “Arthur” has won his tribunal claim and been awarded over £12,000. Where did the employer go wrong?
An employee who was sacked after he claimed for two lunches whilst travelling on a work-related business trip has lost his claim for unfair dismissal. Why did the tribunal find in the employer’s
favour?
An employee who was dismissed after his employer discovered that he was operating a sex business from its car park has won his claim for unfair dismissal. Where did the employer go wrong?
According to media reports a male MP was seen watching porn in the House of Commons by a colleague in April 2022. If one of your employees was observed doing the same thing, would this automatically
be gross misconduct?
The tribunal has ruled that an employee who was sacked for liking and sharing a Facebook post which criticised her boss was unfairly dismissed. Where did the employer go wrong?
Many employees go away on overnight business trips. Whilst some may choose to relax over a drink or two in the evening, what if this gets out of hand? Could the directors use an incident of drunken
behaviour to justify dismissal?
It’s come to the directors’ attention that an employee has been using the company’s IT systems to access pornographic websites. Surely this behaviour amounts to gross misconduct and they can be
summarily dismissed?
The tribunal has found that an employee who was sacked after he was overheard on Zoom making a potentially offensive comment to his wife was unfairly dismissed. Why did the employer not have solid
grounds for dismissal?
An employee who was dismissed for gross misconduct after he told an abusive customer to “fuck off” has won his claim for unfair dismissal at the tribunal. Where did the employer go wrong?
An employee who was sacked for sending a customer’s details to a colleague using his personal mobile phone has successfully claimed unfair dismissal, even though he admitted wrongdoing. Why did the
employer lose at the tribunal?