HARASSMENT
Sexual harassment - but it was “man to man”!
In a recent case, a man alleged that a male colleague had sexually harassed him. The employer argued that as the behaviour was “man to man”, he could not have been offended by it. What view did the tribunal take on this?
Access to this part of
Tips & Advice Business Database is only available to subscribers.
Don't have a subscription?
Subscribe now for immediate access to all the features.
Subscribe